Construction (Head Protection) Regulations
[edit] Key takeaways
These regulations mandated employers to provide and ensure the wearing of suitable head protection on construction sites. The primary duty was to assess the risk of head injury and act unless no foreseeable risk existed. Site controllers had to implement written rules, and Sikhs who wear turbans were exempt. The regulations were revoked in 2013, with their requirements now covered under broader PPE legislation.
[edit] Background
The Construction (Head Protection) Regulations 1989 were introduced to safeguard workers on construction and engineering sites from head injuries. The rules required that employers or self-employed persons provide suitable head protection—typically safety helmets—whenever there was a foreseeable risk to the head. Those in control of a site were responsible for establishing written rules to enforce helmet use and ensuring compliance by everyone on site. Notably, there was an exemption for Sikhs wearing turbans, acknowledging religious requirements while upholding broader site safety obligations.
These regulations came into force on 30 March 1990 but were repealed on 6 April 2013. The Health and Safety (Miscellaneous Repeals, Revocations and Amendments) Regulations 2013 removed the 1989 rules, as their requirements had become redundant—covered instead by the more general Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 (as amended) and other construction regulations.
Under the 1989 regulations, the safety helmet had to be maintained, replaced as necessary, and worn correctly according to the site rules. The employer or site manager had to actively enforce these provisions. The turban-wearing Sikh exemption applied only to head protection; individuals still had to comply with other PPE requirements.
Today, although the 1989 Regulations are no longer in effect, the obligation to provide and ensure the wearing of suitable head protection persists under the 1992 PPE Regulations, which place a duty on employers to supply appropriate protective equipment and ensure its use when risks remain after other mitigations.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
The 2026 Compliance Landscape: Fire doors
Why 'Business as Usual' is a Liability.
Cutting construction carbon footprint by caring for soil
Is construction neglecting one of the planet’s most powerful carbon stores and one of our greatest natural climate allies.
ARCHITECTURE: How's it progressing?
Archiblogger posing questions of a historical and contextual nature.
The roofscape of Hampstead Garden Suburb
Residents, architects and roofers need to understand detailing.
Homes, landlords. tenants and the new housing standards
What will it all mean?
The Architectural Technology podcast: Where it's AT
Catch-up on the latest episodes.
Edmundson Apprentice of the Year award 2026
Entries now open for this Electrical Contractors' Association award.
Traditional blue-grey slate from one of the oldest and largest UK slate quarries down in Cornwall.
There are plenty of sources with the potential to be redeveloped.
Change of use legislation breaths new life into buildings
A run down on Class MA of the General Permitted Development Order.
Solar generation in the historic environment
Success requires understanding each site in detail.
Level 6 Design, Construction and Management BSc
CIOB launches first-ever degree programme to develop the next generation of construction leaders.
Open for business as of April, with its 2026 prospectus and new pipeline of housing schemes.
The operational value of workforce health
Keeping projects moving. Incorporating unplanned absence and the importance of health, in operations.
A carbon case for indigenous slate
UK slate can offer clear embodied carbon advantages.
Costs and insolvencies mount for SMEs, despite growth
Construction sector under insolvency and wage bill pressure in part linked to National Insurance, says report.





















